Visit SuperUnspecial's column >>

SUPERUNSPECIALHome Page

Proving that this is the Best of all Possible Worlds
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 34; Links Seeded: 150
Member Since: 7/2007Last Seen: 11/06/2009

Oil vs. the Environment: What is the Tradeoff?

advertisement

Let's see, John McCain wants to drill offshore to increase oil supply and lower gas prices. Barack Obama says he wants to protect the environment and maintain the ban on such drilling. What is a voter to do?

Well, one piece of information that might be relevant is how much we expect the potential oil production to lower prices. After all, we probably wouldn't destroy a nice city park for a 0.1 cent reduction in the price of a gallon of gas, while some folks would destroy Yellowstone, the Everglades and everything in between to cut gas prices by $1.00 a gallon, so what are we talking about here?

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.6
{"commentId":2041527,"authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}

I'm still up in the air if about whether I think we should expand drilling for near-term, high gas prices... my gut says no, but ultimately it seems so close to a push.

{"commentId":2041527,"threadId":"298086","contentId":"1606812","authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}
    Reply#1 - Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:14 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2049902,"authorDomain":"tgolferman"}

    It has been reported that oil supply is not the problem. It has been stated that refining capacity is the problem. Big oil has shut down refineries that we're supposedly inefficient without replacing them and Bush's Oil gang has turned a blind eye to that. So I guess McCain is not an option since drilling more won't do anything until refining capacity is increased. I'm also a little skeptical of the claims that Obama would rather protect the environment than figure out how to get us some economic relief in regard to fuel costs. I need someone to show me where Obama is quoted as against drilling if that would help.

    {"commentId":2049902,"threadId":"298086","contentId":"1606812","authorDomain":"tgolferman"}
      Reply#2 - Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:03 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2050238,"authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}

      This article quotes him as opposing lifting the ban on drilling in the gulf. But I'm guessing you want an Obama quote that validates the GOP characterization of Obama's position. One does not exist because their characterization is strait up wrong. This article helps put the numbers in perspective...whatever cost to the environment that opening up drilling in the gulf would have, it would only save us about $.03/gal

      {"commentId":2050238,"threadId":"298086","contentId":"1606812","authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}
        #2.1 - Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:58 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":3603780,"authorDomain":"Leafgreen"}
        LeafgreenDeleted
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"298086","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"298086","contentId":"1606812"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking